Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4278E18291 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76619 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2015 08:17:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 76519 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2015 08:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 76459 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2015 08:17:11 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:17:11 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C742C1F90 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14947) WALProcedureStore improvements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15048267#comment-15048267 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-14947: ----------------------------------- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12776484/HBASE-14947-v1.patch against master branch at commit 7bfbb6a3c9af4b0e2853b5ea2580a05bb471211b. ATTACHMENT ID: 12776484 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.6.1 2.7.0 2.7.1) {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 protoc{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of protoc compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch does not generate new checkstyle errors. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . {color:green}+1 zombies{color}. No zombie tests found running at the end of the build. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16806//testReport/ Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16806//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16806//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16806//console This message is automatically generated. > WALProcedureStore improvements > ------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-14947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14947 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: proc-v2 > Reporter: Ashu Pachauri > Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HBASE-14947-v0.patch, HBASE-14947-v1.patch > > > We ended up with a deadlock in HBASE-14943, with the storeTracker and lock acquired in reverse order by syncLoop() and insert/update/delete. In the syncLoop() with don't need the lock when we try to roll or removeInactive. also we can move the insert/update/delete tracker check in the syncLoop avoiding to the extra lock operation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)