hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11843) MapReduce classes shouldn't be in hbase-server
Date Thu, 03 Dec 2015 02:10:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15037081#comment-15037081

stack commented on HBASE-11843:

These subtasks look great.

> MapReduce classes shouldn't be in hbase-server
> ----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-11843
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Keegan Witt
>            Assignee: Nate Edel
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
> I'm opening this to continue the discussion I started a while back: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201405.mbox/%3CCAMUu0w_XooxeG779rRFjTuRAU+UxeAvuNzxKw9dxFO-gh5yVUw@mail.gmail.com%3E.
> To summarize, I think the MapReduce classes used by clients (like TableMapper, TableReducer,
etc) don't belong in hbase-server.  This forces the user to pull in a rather large artifact
for a relatively small number of classes.  These should either be put in hbase-client, or
possibly an artifact of their own (like the hbase-mapreduce idea Enis suggested).

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message