hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14779) Revamp IntegrationTestMTTR
Date Sat, 07 Nov 2015 01:13:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14994817#comment-14994817
] 

stack commented on HBASE-14779:
-------------------------------

Patch seems fine. +1 if it works for you.

So, this test is not like the others? Suggest you add some examples to the usage emission
on commit, especially when it different... perhaps even a warning on emission that this is
not like the others.

	 * NOTE: this cannot run with a chaosmonkey policy because there are two tables and the
125	 * IntegartionTetCase can only protect one table and cf from alters.
126	  */

Can you say more on commit; I'm not sure I follow.

> Revamp IntegrationTestMTTR
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14779
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14779
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: integration tests
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh
>            Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh
>         Attachments: hbase-14779.patch
>
>
> I've recently been trying to revive IntegrationTestMTTR runs and found that it tended
to not complete in less 6 hours and wasn't written as many of the other Integration Tests.
> I'm going to revamp it a local it run of it can finish in < 30mins and to make it
more configurable for a run against  a real cluster.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message