hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14735) Region may grow too big and can not be split
Date Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:41:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14989483#comment-14989483
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-14735:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12770566/14735-branch-1.2.patch
  against branch-1.2 branch at commit ceddec9141b658c790d2fb995c970982ab082028.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12770566

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions
(2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.6.1 2.7.0 2.7.1)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new Findbugs (version
2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

      {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are possible 1 zombie test(s): 

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16384//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) 	warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16384//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16384//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16384//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Region may grow too big and can not be split
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14735
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14735
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compaction, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.2, 0.98.15
>            Reporter: Shuaifeng Zhou
>            Assignee: Shuaifeng Zhou
>         Attachments: 14735-0.98.patch, 14735-branch-1.1.patch, 14735-branch-1.2.patch,
14735-master (2).patch, 14735-master.patch, 14735-master.patch
>
>
> When a compaction completed, may there are also many storefiles in the store, and CompactPriority
< 0, then compactSplitThread will do a "Recursive enqueue" compaction request instead of
request a split:
> {code:title=CompactSplitThread.java|borderStyle=solid}
>         if (completed) {
>           // degenerate case: blocked regions require recursive enqueues
>           if (store.getCompactPriority() <= 0) {
>             requestSystemCompaction(region, store, "Recursive enqueue");
>           } else {
>             // see if the compaction has caused us to exceed max region size
>             requestSplit(region);
>           }
> {code}
> But in some situation, the "recursive enqueue" request may return null, and not build
up a new compaction runner. For example, an other compaction of the same region is running,
and compaction selection will exclude all files older than the newest files currently compacting,
this may cause no enough files can be selected by the "recursive enqueue" request. When this
happen, split will not be trigged. If the input load is high enough, compactions aways running
on the region, and split will never be triggered.
> In our cluster, this situation happened, and a huge region more than 400GB and 100+ storefiles
appeared. Version is 0.98.10, and the trank also have the problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message