hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12790) Support fairness across parallelized scans
Date Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:52:27 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14992100#comment-14992100
] 

stack commented on HBASE-12790:
-------------------------------

Phoenix shouldn't have to add its own scheduler. Phoenix changing basic functionality of hbase
is not sustainable; for phoenix nor hbase; neither project has resources to ensure custom
scheduler and executor setups perform and are bug free at scale. Phoenix shouldn't have to
do hbase customization given that what Phoenix wants of the scheduler is super basic (staccato
scan rather than sustained). I've asked if this groupid specialization is a deal breaker or
will pulling on exisiting attributes whether connection identifier or scan attributes will
do. I may have been answered above or over in rb but have not seen it if I have.

> Support fairness across parallelized scans
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12790
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>              Labels: Phoenix
>         Attachments: AbstractRoundRobinQueue.java, HBASE-12790.patch, HBASE-12790_1.patch,
HBASE-12790_5.patch, HBASE-12790_callwrapper.patch, HBASE-12790_trunk_1.patch, PHOENIX_4.5.3-HBase-0.98-2317-SNAPSHOT.zip
>
>
> Some HBase clients parallelize the execution of a scan to reduce latency in getting back
results. This can lead to starvation with a loaded cluster and interleaved scans, since the
RPC queue will be ordered and processed on a FIFO basis. For example, if there are two clients,
A & B that submit largish scans at the same time. Say each scan is broken down into 100
scans by the client (broken down into equal depth chunks along the row key), and the 100 scans
of client A are queued first, followed immediately by the 100 scans of client B. In this case,
client B will be starved out of getting any results back until the scans for client A complete.
> One solution to this is to use the attached AbstractRoundRobinQueue instead of the standard
FIFO queue. The queue to be used could be (maybe it already is) configurable based on a new
config parameter. Using this queue would require the client to have the same identifier for
all of the 100 parallel scans that represent a single logical scan from the clients point
of view. With this information, the round robin queue would pick off a task from the queue
in a round robin fashion (instead of a strictly FIFO manner) to prevent starvation over interleaved
parallelized scans.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message