hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Heng Chen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11393) Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string
Date Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:46:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15021855#comment-15021855
] 

Heng Chen commented on HBASE-11393:
-----------------------------------

[~ashish singhi] Thanks for your review.  I will fix what you mentioned in RB next version.
Let's see what [~enis] will say. 


> Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11393.patch, HBASE-11393_v1.patch, HBASE-11393_v10.patch,
HBASE-11393_v11.patch, HBASE-11393_v2.patch, HBASE-11393_v3.patch, HBASE-11393_v4.patch, HBASE-11393_v5.patch,
HBASE-11393_v6.patch, HBASE-11393_v7.patch, HBASE-11393_v8.patch, HBASE-11393_v9.patch
>
>
> We concatenate the list of tables and column families in format  "table1:cf1,cf2;table2:cfA,cfB"
in zookeeper for table-cf to replication peer mapping. 
> This results in ugly parsing code. We should do this a PB object. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message