Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3398018F7C for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99781 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2015 23:34:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 99731 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2015 23:34:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 99715 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2015 23:34:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 23:34:05 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:34:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gary Helmling (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14580) Make the HBaseMiniCluster compliant with Kerberos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951399#comment-14951399 ] Gary Helmling commented on HBASE-14580: --------------------------------------- {code} "kerberos".equalsIgnoreCase(c.get("hbase.security.authentication", null))) { {code} Instead of hard-coding the config values, can you use {{User.isHBaseSecurityEnabled(c)}}? The username suffixes were fed into the data dirs used by each DN/RS's for a "distributed" minicluster setup (or at least they did way back when I last looked at HBaseTestingUtility). So, as I understand it, that would not be an issue here are Kerberos would only be supported with a single node setup? > Make the HBaseMiniCluster compliant with Kerberos > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-14580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14580 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security, test > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Nicolas Liochon > Assignee: Nicolas Liochon > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: patch-14580.v1.patch > > > Whne using MiniKDC and the minicluster in a unit test, there is a conflict causeed by HBaseTestingUtility: > {code} > public static User getDifferentUser(final Configuration c, > final String differentiatingSuffix) > throws IOException { > // snip > String username = User.getCurrent().getName() + > differentiatingSuffix; <==================== problem here > User user = User.createUserForTesting(c, username, > new String[]{"supergroup"}); > return user; > } > {code} > This creates users like securedUser/localhost@EXAMPLE.COM.hfs.0, and this does not work. > My fix is to return the current user when Kerberos is set. I don't think that there is another option (any other opinion?). However this user is not in a group so we have logs like 'WARN [IPC Server handler 9 on 61366] security.UserGroupInformation (UserGroupInformation.java:getGroupNames(1521)) - No groups available for user securedUser' I'm not sure of its impact. [~apurtell], what do you think? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)