hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14205) RegionCoprocessorHost System.nanoTime() performance bottleneck
Date Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:27:05 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-14205:
-----------------------------------
    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> RegionCoprocessorHost System.nanoTime() performance bottleneck
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14205
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14205
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jan Van Besien
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-14205.patch
>
>
> The tracking of execution time of coprocessor methods introduced in HBASE-11516 introduces
2 calls to System.nanoTime() per coprocessor method per coprocessor. This is resulting in
a serious performance bottleneck in certain scenarios.
> For example consider the scenario where many rows are being ingested (PUT) in a table
which has multiple coprocessors (we have up to 20 coprocessors). This results in 8 extra calls
to System.nanoTime() per coprocessor (prePut, postPut, postStartRegionOperation and postCloseRegionOperation)
which has in total (i.e. times 20) been seen to result in a 50% increase of execution time.
> I think it is generally considered bad practice to measure execution times on such a
small scale (per single operation). Also note that measurements are taken even for coprocessors
that do not even have an actual implementation for certain operations, making the problem
worse.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message