hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13324) o.a.h.h.Coprocessor should be LimitedPrivate("Coprocessor")
Date Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:23:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-13324:
-----------------------------------
    Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> o.a.h.h.Coprocessor should be LimitedPrivate("Coprocessor")
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13324
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Lars George
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 0.98.15, 1.0.3, 1.1.3
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13324.patch
>
>
> The matching classes, like CoprocessorService, which also needs to be added to a developers
class for, e.g. an Endpoint, are all PrivateLimited(COPRO) it seems. I am not sure why they
are in different packages though, the former is in hbase-client, and the latter in hbase-server.
Is this intentional?
> This JIRA is about fixing the annotation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message