Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 972B71026D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50277 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2015 20:43:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50230 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2015 20:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50212 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2015 20:43:45 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:43:45 +0000 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:43:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jerry He (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14275) Backport to 0.98 HBASE-10785 Metas own location should be cached MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14705722#comment-14705722 ] Jerry He commented on HBASE-14275: ---------------------------------- It is not a trivial backport since the HConnectionManager had a major refactoring. But it is still a simple backport. [~enis], Can you check the correctness of the backport? [~apurtell], Do you think it is ok for 0.98? > Backport to 0.98 HBASE-10785 Metas own location should be cached > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-14275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14275 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jerry He > Attachments: HBASE-14275-0.98.patch > > > We've seen similar problem reported on 0.98. > It is good improvement to have. > This will cover HBASE-10785 and the a later HBASE-11332. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)