Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E48FB18A88 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20624 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20575 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20561 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13993) WALProcedureStore fencing is not effective if new WAL rolls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14622793#comment-14622793 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13993: ----------------------------------- {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12744744/HBASE-13993-v3.patch against master branch at commit bff911a8e894f59f6efe6a24f39a7aef5d689882. ATTACHMENT ID: 12744744 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0) {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 protoc{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of protoc compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of checkstyle errors {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14739//testReport/ Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14739//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14739//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14739//console This message is automatically generated. > WALProcedureStore fencing is not effective if new WAL rolls > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-13993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13993 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: master > Reporter: Enis Soztutar > Assignee: Enis Soztutar > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.2, 1.3.0, 1.2.1 > > Attachments: HBASE-13993-v2.patch, HBASE-13993-v3.patch, hbase-13993_v1.patch > > > WAL fencing for the WALProcedureStore is a bit different than the fencing done for region server WALs. > In case of this sequence of events, the WAL is not fenced (especially with HBASE-13832 patch): > - master1 creates WAL with logId = 1: {{/MasterProcWALs/state-00000000000000000001.log}} > - master2 takes over, fences logId = 1 with recoverLease(), creates logId=2: {{/MasterProcWALs/state-00000000000000000002.log}}. > - master2 writes some procedures and rolls the logId2, and creates logId = 3, and deletes logId = 2. > - master1 now tries to write a procedure, gets lease mismatch, rolls the log from 1 to 2, and succeeds the write since it can write logId = 2 (master2 uses logId=3 now). > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)