Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80FF218055 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 01:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13438 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 01:32:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13391 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 01:32:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13376 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2015 01:32:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:32:05 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 01:32:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13832) Procedure V2: master fail to start due to WALProcedureStore sync failures when HDFS data nodes count is low MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14609413#comment-14609413 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13832: ----------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12742965/HBASE-13832-v2.patch against master branch at commit 42d5ef017d3d629e6ca9ee93e15ac4f0f9e00ce1. ATTACHMENT ID: 12742965 {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0) {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 protoc{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of protoc compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. {color:red}-1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch generated 1898 checkstyle errors (more than the master's current 1897 errors). {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 {color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch. {color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14631//testReport/ Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14631//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14631//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/14631//console This message is automatically generated. > Procedure V2: master fail to start due to WALProcedureStore sync failures when HDFS data nodes count is low > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13832 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: master, proc-v2 > Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.1.0, 1.2.0 > Reporter: Stephen Yuan Jiang > Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.2, 1.3.0, 1.2.1 > > Attachments: HBASE-13832-v0.patch, HBASE-13832-v1.patch, HBASE-13832-v2.patch, HDFSPipeline.java, hbase-13832-test-hang.patch > > > when the data node < 3, we got failure in WALProcedureStore#syncLoop() during master start. The failure prevents master to get started. > {noformat} > 2015-05-29 13:27:16,625 ERROR [WALProcedureStoreSyncThread] wal.WALProcedureStore: Sync slot failed, abort. > java.io.IOException: Failed to replace a bad datanode on the existing pipeline due to no more good datanodes being available to try. (Nodes: current=[DatanodeInfoWithStorage[10.333.444.555:50010,DS-3c7777ed-93f4-47b6-9c23-1426f7a6acdc,DISK], DatanodeInfoWithStorage[10.222.666.777:50010,DS-f9c983b4-1f10-4d5e-8983-490ece56c772,DISK]], original=[DatanodeInfoWithStorage[10.333.444.555:50010,DS-3c7777ed-93f4-47b6-9c23-1426f7a6acdc,DISK], DatanodeInfoWithStorage[10.222.666.777:50010,DS-f9c983b4-1f10-4d5e-8983- 490ece56c772,DISK]]). The current failed datanode replacement policy is DEFAULT, and a client may configure this via 'dfs.client.block.write.replace-datanode-on-failure.policy' in its configuration. > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.findNewDatanode(DFSOutputStream.java:951) > {noformat} > One proposal is to implement some similar logic as FSHLog: if IOException is thrown during syncLoop in WALProcedureStore#start(), instead of immediate abort, we could try to roll the log and see whether this resolve the issue; if the new log cannot be created or more exception from rolling the log, we then abort. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)