Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABF8817CD4 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59052 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 06:39:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 59009 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 06:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58997 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2015 06:39:17 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:39:17 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 06:39:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13734) Improper timestamp checking with VisibilityScanDeleteTracker MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14555676#comment-14555676 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-13734: ------------------------------------------------ +1 on patch. Initially used Map thinking retrieval will be bit easier. But List would be the feasible one if we need to track both tags and ts. > Improper timestamp checking with VisibilityScanDeleteTracker > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-13734 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13734 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.98.4 > Reporter: Anoop Sam John > Assignee: Anoop Sam John > Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.14, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1 > > Attachments: HBASE-13734.patch > > > 3 issues > 1. When VC is used and all the put cells and delete cells are not having any visibility associated with them, we are not correctly checking put cells ts against that of delete cell resulting in deletion of cells coming in after the delete ts > 2. Have a row r1 with 2 cells of same TS but different visibility. In order to delete both cells we have to apply 2 deletes with these 2 visibility being set to Delete. We are trying to do this using delete full row option or delete cf way. But only one cell is getting deleted. > 3. Same case as in #2 when I try to delete using family version delete, only one cell is getting deleted. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)