Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B09331826A for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 02:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2015 02:42:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 1229 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2015 02:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 1218 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2015 02:42:00 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 02:42:00 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 02:42:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Liu Shaohui (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13709) Updates to meta table server columns may be eclipsed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14551697#comment-14551697 ] Liu Shaohui commented on HBASE-13709: ------------------------------------- {quote} Yes, this is true. However, this is still an improvement to the current approach. We are using the max or masters time and local RSs time, so the probability is smaller. I would rather do a proper fix around these issues, but it is hard to do without re-writing the whole assignment subsystem. {quote} OK. Thanks [~enis] +1 for me. > Updates to meta table server columns may be eclipsed > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13709 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13709 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Enis Soztutar > Assignee: Enis Soztutar > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1 > > Attachments: hbase-13709_v1.patch, hbase-13709_v1.patch > > > HBASE-11536 fixes a case where on a very rare occasion, the meta updates may be processed out of order. The fix is to use the RS's timestamp for the server column in meta update, but that actually opens up a vulnerability for clock skew (see the discussions in the jira). > For the region replicas case, we can reproduce a problem where the server name field is eclipsed by the masters earlier update because the RS is lagging behind. However, this is not specific to replicas, but occurs more frequently with it. > One option that was discussed was to send the master's ts with open region RPC and use it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)