hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13510) Purge ByteBloomFilter
Date Sat, 16 May 2015 10:58:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14546686#comment-14546686
] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-13510:
----------------------------------------

ByteBloomChunk (or simple BloomChunk) is the correct name now as that is been used in that
sense.  The javadoc need modification. Have to move the doc regarding the general blooms can
be moved to BloomFilter Interface itself?

> Purge ByteBloomFilter
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13510
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13510_1.patch, HBASE-13510_2.patch, HBASE-13510_3.patch
>
>
> In order to address the comments over in HBASE-10800 related to comparing Cell with a
serialized KV's key we had some need for that in Bloom filters.  After discussing with Anoop,
we found that it may be possible to remove/modify some of the APIs in the BloomFilter interfaces
and for doing that we can purge ByteBloomFilter.  
> I read the code and found that ByteBloomFilter was getting used in V1 version only. 
Now as it is obsolete we can remove this code and move some of the static APIs in ByteBloomFilter
to some other util class or bloom related classes which will help us in refactoring the code
too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message