Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12823626.1429836935000.14548.1429846238959@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12823626.1429836935000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12823626.1429836935000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12823626.1429836935648@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13551) Procedure V2 - Procedure classes
 should not be InterfaceAudience.Public
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14510412#comment-14510412 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-13551:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12727777/hbase-13551_v1.patch
  against master branch at commit 031dd3638cff1310d85ce8ba62d2278f5ef1a904.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12727777

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all supported hadoop versions (2.4.1 2.5.2 2.6.0)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of checkstyle errors

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13790//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) 	warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13790//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13790//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

  Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/13790//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Procedure V2 - Procedure classes should not be InterfaceAudience.Public
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13551
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13551
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: master
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-13551_v1.patch
>
>
> Just noticed this. We have ProcedureStore, and exceptions and some procedures declared as {{InterfaceAudience.Public}}. We should really make them Private or LimiterPrivate since Public is for user comsumption. Are we exposing Procedures to coprocessors? I do not see a use case for that, so it should be Private IMO.  


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)