Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5749917FD1 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41575 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41541 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41530 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:41:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13497) Remove MVCC stamps from HFile when that is safe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14521788#comment-14521788 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-13497: --------------------------------------- Arrgghh... Lemme commit this today. Talked with [~stack] offline. As long as we zero the MVCC stamps, this is safe (just avoids storing stamps that are know to be zero). In another issue we need to discuss when exactly it _is_ safe to zero the MVCC stamps. > Remove MVCC stamps from HFile when that is safe > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13497 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13497 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Scanners > Reporter: Lars Hofhansl > Assignee: Lars Hofhansl > Labels: performance > Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1 > > Attachments: 13497.txt > > > See discussion in HBASE-13389. > The optimization was initially put in with HBASE-8166, HBASE-12600 undoes it, this will partially restores it. > Instead of checking the MVCC readpoints against the oldest current scanner, we check that all are 0, if so, we do not need to write them. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)