Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF8F917F83 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40356 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2015 00:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 40245 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2015 00:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 40002 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2015 00:48:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:48:12 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:48:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13375) Provide HBase superuser higher priority over other users in the RPC handling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14484458#comment-14484458 ] Devaraj Das commented on HBASE-13375: ------------------------------------- I agree that it's weird. Without the patch and with the change in getPriority, does it fail similarly? > Provide HBase superuser higher priority over other users in the RPC handling > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-13375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: rpc > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Mikhail Antonov > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-13375-v0.patch > > > HBASE-13351 annotates Master RPCs so that RegionServer RPCs are treated with a higher priority compared to user RPCs (and they are handled by a separate set of handlers, etc.). It may be good to stretch this to users too - hbase superuser (configured via hbase.superuser) gets higher priority over other users in the RPC handling. That way the superuser can always perform administrative operations on the cluster even if all the normal priority handlers are occupied (for example, we had a situation where all the master's handlers were tied up with many simultaneous createTable RPC calls from multiple users and the master wasn't able to perform any operations initiated by the admin). (Discussed this some with [~enis] and [~elserj]). > Does this make sense to others? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)