hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13472) Polish IN_MEMORY table behavior
Date Wed, 15 Apr 2015 06:32:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14495738#comment-14495738

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-13472:

Thanks for the clarification

> Polish IN_MEMORY table behavior
> -------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-13472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13472
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> For a long time we've been able to support a mode of operation that keeps as much table
data as possible in memory, so HBase can be used as an 'in-memory' DB with fully durable WAL
and write-behind persistence of table data. However:
> - There are a set of relevant schema options (IN_MEMORY, CACHE_ON_WRITE, PREFETCH_BLOCKS_ON_OPEN,
block encoding), so set up isn't simple. We should have a shortcut that sets all this up in
one place. I'm thinking a utility class with static helpers that configure a table descriptor
with all of the needed bits. (Other ideas?) 
> - We don't have a safety valve. An in-memory table can become too large, where it falls
out of blockcache and performs poorly without warning because it's become too big. Consider
table quota support with an option for region size limits as % of total heap consumed by regions
for a given table. Warn at soft limit. Refuse writes if over hard limit.
> Follow on work can investigate options hooking up to offheap work. That's not in scope

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message