hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13375) Provide HBase superuser higher priority over other users in the RPC handling
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:40:06 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14516523#comment-14516523
] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-13375:
----------------------------------------

loadSuperUsers(Configuration conf)
Whether we need lazy loading in isSuperUser that an explicit loadSuperUsers call.  The explicit
call look dangerous as what if this is missed in one process?  Are we doing the load in RS
and HM?
When lazy loading we have to pass the Conf to isSuperUser by the way.

Still I am not liking these methods in User.java
getGroupName(String aclKey) 
isGroupPrincipal(String name) 

Rest all coming good.

> Provide HBase superuser higher priority over other users in the RPC handling
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13375
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13375
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: rpc
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Mikhail Antonov
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13375-v0.patch, HBASE-13375-v1.patch, HBASE-13375-v1.patch,
HBASE-13375-v1.patch, HBASE-13375-v2.patch, HBASE-13375-v3.patch, HBASE-13375-v4.patch
>
>
> HBASE-13351 annotates Master RPCs so that RegionServer RPCs are treated with a higher
priority compared to user RPCs (and they are handled by a separate set of handlers, etc.).
It may be good to stretch this to users too - hbase superuser (configured via hbase.superuser)
gets higher priority over other users in the RPC handling. That way the superuser can always
perform administrative operations on the cluster even if all the normal priority handlers
are occupied (for example, we had a situation where all the master's handlers were tied up
with many simultaneous createTable RPC calls from multiple users and the master wasn't able
to perform any operations initiated by the admin). (Discussed this some with [~enis] and [~elserj]).
> Does this make sense to others?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message