Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12785717.1427324737000.74332.1427758792933@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12785717.1427324737000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12785717.1427324737000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12785717.1427324737238@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13335) Update ClientSmallScanner and
 ClientSmallReversedScanner
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14387611#comment-14387611 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-13335:
------------------------------------

Thanks for taking a look.

bq. not a generic callable factory (callables can be any method). 

That's a good point. I meant it was {{o.a.h.hbase.client.RetryingCallable}}, but the name doesn't quite denote that well :)

bq. Maybe we can make it an internal class

Suggestions? Inner class on ClientSmallScanner? Something else?

> Update ClientSmallScanner and ClientSmallReversedScanner
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13335
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 0.98.13
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13335.patch
>
>
> Some follow-on work for HBASE-13262:
> it's unlikely that clients using the small scanners would get enough data to run into the initial bug, but the scanner implementations should still adhere to the moreResultsInRegion flag when the server sends it.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)