hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-13291) Lift the scan ceiling
Date Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:15:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14370750#comment-14370750
] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-13291:
------------------------------------------------

Anyway I got your point here. We do a lot of CPUs but still the number of ops does not increase
greatly is what you say.  Changing to INCLUDE would not affect this. Sorry. 

> Lift the scan ceiling
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13291
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>         Attachments: traces.filterall.svg, traces.nofilter.svg, traces.smaller.svg
>
>
> Scanning medium sized rows with multiple concurrent scanners exhibits interesting 'ceiling'
properties. A server runs at about 6.7k ops a second using 450% of possible 1600% of CPUs
 when 4 clients each with 10 threads doing scan 1000 rows.  If I add '--filterAll' argument
(do not return results), then we run at 1450% of possible 1600% possible but we do 8k ops
a second.
> Let me attach flame graphs for two cases. Unfortunately, there is some frustrating dark
art going on. Let me try figure it... Filing issue in meantime to keep score in.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message