Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B12317D7D for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94824 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 17:26:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 94785 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2015 17:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 94678 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2015 17:26:36 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:26:36 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:26:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dima Spivak (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12954) Ability impaired using HBase on multihomed hosts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14301485#comment-14301485 ] Dima Spivak commented on HBASE-12954: ------------------------------------- Seeing as how [~clayb] marked this as affecting a 0.98 release, do you see this going into master alone, [~tedyu] or other branches, as well? If others, what implications would it have for wire compatibility? > Ability impaired using HBase on multihomed hosts > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-12954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12954 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.98.4 > Reporter: Clay B. > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 12954-v1.txt, Hadoop Three Interfaces.png > > > For HBase clusters running on unusual networks (such as NAT'd cloud environments or physical machines with multiple IP's per network interface) it would be ideal to have a way to both specify: > # which IP interface to which HBase master or region-server will bind > # what hostname HBase will advertise in Zookeeper both for a master or region-server process > While efforts such as HBASE-8640 go a long way to normalize these two sources of information, it is not possible in the current design of the properties available to an administrator for these to be unambiguously specified. > One has been able to request {{hbase.master.ipc.address}} or {{hbase.regionserver.ipc.address}} but one can not specify the desired HBase {{hbase.master.hostname}}. (It was removed in HBASE-1357, further I am unaware of a region-server equivalent.) > I use a configuration management system to generate all of my configuration files on a per-machine basis. As such, an option to generate a file specifying exactly which hostname to use would be helpful. > Today, specifying the bind address for HBase works and one can use an HBase-only DNS for faking what to put in Zookeeper but this is far from ideal. Network interfaces have no intrinsic IP address, nor hostname. Specifing a DNS server is awkward as the DNS server may differ from the system's resolver and is a single IP address. Similarly, on hosts which use a transient VIP (e.g. through keepalived) for other services, it means there's a seemingly non-deterministic hostname choice made by HBase depending on the state of the VIP at daemon start-up time. > I will attach two networking examples I use which become very difficult to manage under the current properties. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)