hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "churro morales (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13031) Ability to snapshot based on a key range
Date Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:48:09 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

churro morales updated HBASE-13031:
    Attachment: HBASE-13031.patch

Attached the trunk patch for ability to snapshot key ranges.  If folks are interested in getting
this upstream, I can provide backports for 1.x, 98.x and 94.

> Ability to snapshot based on a key range
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-13031
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13031
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: churro morales
>            Assignee: churro morales
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.94.26, 1.1.0, 0.98.11
>         Attachments: HBASE-13031.patch
> Posted on the mailing list and seems like some people are interested.  A little background
for everyone.
> We have a very large table, we would like to snapshot and transfer the data to another
cluster (compressed data is always better to ship).  Our problem lies in the fact it could
take many weeks to transfer all of the data and during that time with major compactions, the
data stored in dfs has the potential to double which would cause us to run out of disk space.
> So we were thinking about allowing the ability to snapshot a specific key range.  
> Ideally I feel the approach is that the user would specify a start and stop key, those
would be associated with a region boundary.  If between the time the user submits the request
and the snapshot is taken the boundaries change (due to merging or splitting of regions) the
snapshot should fail.
> We would know which regions to snapshot and if those changed between when the request
was submitted and the regions locked, the snapshot could simply fail and the user would try
again, instead of potentially giving the user more / less than what they had anticipated.
 I was planning on storing the start / stop key in the SnapshotDescription and from there
it looks pretty straight forward where we just have to change the verifier code to accommodate
the key ranges.  
> If this design sounds good to anyone, or if I am overlooking anything please let me know.
 Once we agree on the design, I'll write and submit the patches.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message