hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11409) Add more flexibility for input directory structure to LoadIncrementalHFiles
Date Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:07:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14319093#comment-14319093
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11409:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12698545/HBASE-11409.0.98.patch
  against 0.98 branch at commit e0160d69379401a7381ddaa478b53c9833379fe2.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12698545

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 8 new or modified
tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/12808//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Add more flexibility for input directory structure to LoadIncrementalHFiles
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11409
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.20, 2.0.0, 1.1.0, 0.98.11
>            Reporter: churro morales
>            Assignee: churro morales
>         Attachments: HBASE-11409-0.94.patch, HBASE-11409.0.94.v1.patch, HBASE-11409.0.98.patch,
HBASE-11409.patch
>
>
> Use case:
> We were trying to combine two very large tables into a single table.  Thus we ran jobs
in one datacenter that populated certain column families and another datacenter which populated
other column families.  Took a snapshot and exported them to their respective datacenters.
 Wanted to simply take the hdfs restored snapshot and use LoadIncremental to merge the data.
 
> It would be nice to add support where we could run LoadIncremental on a directory where
the depth of store files is something other than two (current behavior).  
> With snapshots it would be nice if you could pass a restored hdfs snapshot's directory
and have the tool run.  
> I am attaching a patch where I parameterize the bulkLoad timeout as well as the default
store file depth.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message