Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C497F1787C for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9823 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2014 05:08:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9775 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2014 05:08:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9761 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2014 05:08:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:08:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:08:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jingcheng Du (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12433) Coprocessors not dynamically reordered when reset priority MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14205951#comment-14205951 ] Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-12433: -------------------------------------- Hi James [~jamestaylor], you changed the coprocessor priority by altering table in HBase shell? Did you disabled/enabled the table at that time? > Coprocessors not dynamically reordered when reset priority > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-12433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12433 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Coprocessors > Affects Versions: 0.98.7 > Reporter: James Taylor > > When modifying the coprocessor priority through the HBase shell, the order of the firing of the coprocessors wasn't changing. It probably would have with a cluster bounce, but if we can make it dynamic easily, that would be preferable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)