Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13BB2176D7 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77771 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 05:34:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 77736 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2014 05:34:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 77725 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2014 05:34:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:34:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:34:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-12303) Seek to next row after family delete markers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl updated HBASE-12303: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Nah. The FAMILY_DELETE marker does not effect columns with a newer timestamp, so we can't rule out that there are newer columns not effected by this delete marker, we need to check them one-by-one. Meh. > Seek to next row after family delete markers > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-12303 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12303 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Lars Hofhansl > Attachments: 12303.txt > > > Currently we seek to the next column when we encounter a family delete marker. > I think we safely seek the current store to next row. > We ran into a scenario with very slow scans after a lot of rows have been deleted with family delete markers. Some profiling revealed that we seek for once for each row and column. > This won't make this go away entirely, but at least we can seek once per row rather than once per column. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)