hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11990) Make setting the start and stop row for a specific prefix easier
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:22:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14162060#comment-14162060
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11990:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12673378/HBASE-11990-20140923-v10.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12673378

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 7 new or modified
tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11239//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Make setting the start and stop row for a specific prefix easier
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11990
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Client
>            Reporter: Niels Basjes
>         Attachments: 11990v4.txt, HBASE-11990-20140916-v2.patch, HBASE-11990-20140916-v3.patch,
HBASE-11990-20140916-v5.patch, HBASE-11990-20140916-v6.patch, HBASE-11990-20140916.patch,
HBASE-11990-20140917-v7.patch, HBASE-11990-20140919-v8.patch, HBASE-11990-20140921-v9.patch,
HBASE-11990-20140923-v10.patch, HBASE-11990-20140923-v10.patch
>
>
> If you want to set a scan from your application to scan for a specific row prefix this
is actually quite hard.
> As described in several places you can set the startRow to the prefix; yet the stopRow
should be set to the prefix '+1'
> If the prefix 'ASCII' put into a byte[] then this is easy because you can simply increment
the last byte of the array. 
> But if your application uses real binary rowids you may run into the scenario that your
prefix is something like 
> {code}{ 0x12, 0x23, 0xFF, 0xFF }{code} Then the increment should be {code}{ 0x12, 0x24
}{code}
> I have prepared a proposed patch that makes setting these values correctly a lot easier.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message