Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6264517D06 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83816 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2014 23:19:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 83776 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2014 23:19:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 83691 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2014 23:19:35 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:19:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:19:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12040) Performances issues with FilteredScanTest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14148471#comment-14148471 ] Devaraj Das commented on HBASE-12040: ------------------------------------- Interesting .. you are seeing the opposite of what I am seeing. Performance decreases for me with HBASE-11331. Let me dig further. > Performances issues with FilteredScanTest > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HBASE-12040 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12040 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.99.1 > Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari > Assignee: stack > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.98.7, 0.99.1 > > Attachments: at-HBASE-11331.html, pre-HBASE-11331.html > > > While testing 0.99.0RC1 release performances, compared to 0.98.6, figured that: > - FilteredScanTest is 100 times slower; > - RandomReadTest is 1.5 times slower; > - RandomSeekScanTest is 3.2 times slower; > - RandomScanWithRange10Test is 1,2 times slower; > - RandomScanWithRange100Test is 1,3 times slower; > - RandomScanWithRange1000Test is 4 times slower; > - SequentialReadTest is 1,7 times slower; > - SequentialWriteTest is just a bit faster; > - RandomWriteTest is just a bit faster; > - GaussianRandomReadBenchmark is just a beat slower; > - SequentialReadBenchmark is 1,1 times slower; > - SequentialWriteBenchmark is 1,1 times slower; > - UniformRandomReadBenchmark crashed; > - UniformRandomSmallScan is 1,3 times slower. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)