Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E9E211D4D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25801 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2014 21:12:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 25601 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2014 21:12:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 25474 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2014 21:12:40 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:12:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:12:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HBASE-4744) Remove @Ignore for testLogRollAfterSplitStart MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated HBASE-4744: ------------------------------- Attachment: HBASE_4744.patch first pass at re-enabling this test. had to clean up some null handling in logging. reading through things, would testLogRollAfterSplitStart be better placed in TestLogRollAbort rather than TestHLogSplit? The test is related to splitting, but AFAICT the desired end result is that the RS should abort, which seems be the intention of the LogRollAbort class. > Remove @Ignore for testLogRollAfterSplitStart > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-4744 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4744 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Test > Affects Versions: 0.94.0 > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HBASE_4744.patch > > > We fixed a data loss bug in HBASE-2312 by adding non-recursive creates to HDFS. Although a number of HDFS versions have this fix, the official HDFS 0.20.205 branch currently doesn't, so we needed to mark the test as ignored. Please revisit before the RC of 0.94, which should have 0.20.205.1 or later & the necessary HDFS patches. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)