hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-11586) HFile's HDFS op latency sampling code is not used
Date Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:16:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14073780#comment-14073780
] 

Lars Hofhansl edited comment on HBASE-11586 at 7/25/14 1:15 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

\+1 for branch-1+. 


was (Author: enis):
+1 for branch-1+. 

> HFile's HDFS op latency sampling code is not used
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11586
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11586
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.4
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>             Fix For: 0.99.0, 0.98.5, 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11586.patch, HBASE-11586.patch
>
>
> HFileReaderV2 calls HFile#offerReadLatency and HFileWriterV2 calls HFile#offerWriteLatency
but the samples are never drained. There are no callers of HFile#getReadLatenciesNanos, HFile#getWriteLatenciesNanos,
and related. The three ArrayBlockingQueues we are using as sample buffers in HFile will fill
quickly and are never drained. 
> There are also no callers of HFile#getReadTimeMs or HFile#getWriteTimeMs, and related,
so we are incrementing a set of AtomicLong counters that will never be read nor reset.
> We are calling System.nanoTime in block read and write paths twice but not utilizing
the measurements.
> We should hook this code back up to metrics or remove it.
> We are also not using HFile#getChecksumFailuresCount anywhere but in some unit test code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message