Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 05:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12720469.1402439816539.131628.1402722782172@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12720469.1402439816539@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12720469.1402439816539@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11322) SnapshotHFileCleaner makes the
 wrong check for lastModified time thus causing too many cache refreshes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14031472#comment-14031472 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-11322:
---------------------------------------

That doesn't seem right, though. I think to be correct we need to keep track of both timestamp and refresh if either has changed.

> SnapshotHFileCleaner makes the wrong check for lastModified time thus causing too many cache refreshes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11322
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.19
>            Reporter: churro morales
>            Assignee: churro morales
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.94.21
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11322.patch
>
>
> The SnapshotHFileCleaner calls the SnapshotFileCache if a particular HFile in question is part of a snapshot.
> If the HFile is not in the cache, we then refresh the cache and check again.
> But the cache refresh checks to see if anything has been modified since the last cache refresh but this logic is incorrect in certain scenarios.
> The last modified time is done via this operation:
> {code}
> this.lastModifiedTime = Math.min(dirStatus.getModificationTime(),
>                                      tempStatus.getModificationTime());
> {code}
> and the check to see if the snapshot directories have been modified:
> {code}
> // if the snapshot directory wasn't modified since we last check, we are done
>     if (dirStatus.getModificationTime() <= lastModifiedTime &&
>         tempStatus.getModificationTime() <= lastModifiedTime) {
>       return;
>     }
> {code}
> Suppose the following happens:
> dirStatus modified 6-1-2014
> tempStatus modified 6-2-2014
> lastModifiedTime = 6-1-2014
> provided these two directories don't get modified again all subsequent checks wont exit early, like they should.
> In our cluster, this was a huge performance hit.  The cleaner chain fell behind, thus almost filling up dfs and our namenode heap.
> Its a simple fix, instead of Math.min we use Math.max for the lastModified, I believe that will be correct.
> I'll apply a patch for you guys.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)