Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7FC1119D2 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30717 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30672 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30661 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:07:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10504) Define Replication Interface MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14029806#comment-14029806 ] Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-10504: -------------------------------------------- As long as the RE daemons are disjoint from the region servers that would work, since you need to be able to have as many/few of them as you want, plus to be able to have them on different machines. I could even see this as being useful for certain use cases that want inter-HBase replication to be done through specific gateways. We then have to architect a way to discover those endpoints, etc... kind of what the current replication code already does with sinks. > Define Replication Interface > ---------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-10504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10504 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: stack > Assignee: Enis Soztutar > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.99.0 > > Attachments: hbase-10504_v1.patch, hbase-10504_wip1.patch > > > HBase has replication. Fellas have been hijacking the replication apis to do all kinds of perverse stuff like indexing hbase content (hbase-indexer https://github.com/NGDATA/hbase-indexer) and our [~toffer] just showed up w/ overrides that replicate via an alternate channel (over a secure thrift channel between dcs over on HBASE-9360). This issue is about surfacing these APIs as public with guarantees to downstreamers similar to those we have on our public client-facing APIs (and so we don't break them for downstreamers). > Any input [~phunt] or [~gabriel.reid] or [~toffer]? > Thanks. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)