hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Yu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10965) Automate detection of presence of Filter#filterRow()
Date Fri, 02 May 2014 23:15:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13988406#comment-13988406
] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-10965:
--------------------------------

>From https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9449/consoleFull :
{code}
HBASE-10965 patch is being downloaded at Fri May  2 20:53:24 UTC 2014 from
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12643103/10965-v6.txt
...

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12-TRUNK-HBASE-2:test (secondPartTestsExecution) @ hbase-shell
---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/trunk/hbase-shell/target/surefire-reports
[INFO] Using configured provider org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider
...
FATAL: hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination
of the channel
hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: java.io.IOException:
Unexpected termination of the channel
	at hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException.wrapForRethrow(RequestAbortedException.java:41)
	at hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException.wrapForRethrow(RequestAbortedException.java:34)
{code}
Basically hbase-server tests passed but the build got aborted.

> Automate detection of presence of Filter#filterRow()
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10965
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Filters
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>         Attachments: 10965-v1.txt, 10965-v2.txt, 10965-v3.txt, 10965-v4.txt, 10965-v6.txt
>
>
> There is potential inconsistency between the return value of Filter#hasFilterRow() and
presence of Filter#filterRow().
> Filters may override Filter#filterRow() while leaving return value of Filter#hasFilterRow()
being false (inherited from FilterBase).
> Downside to purely depending on hasFilterRow() telling us whether custom filter overrides
filterRow(List) or filterRow() is that the check below may be rendered ineffective:
> {code}
>           if (nextKv == KV_LIMIT) {
>             if (this.filter != null && filter.hasFilterRow()) {
>               throw new IncompatibleFilterException(
>                 "Filter whose hasFilterRow() returns true is incompatible with scan with
limit!");
>             }
> {code}
> When user forgets to override hasFilterRow(), the above check becomes not useful.
> Another limitation is that we cannot optimize FilterList#filterRow() through short circuit
when FilterList#hasFilterRow() turns false.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11093?focusedCommentId=13985149&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13985149
> This JIRA aims to remove the inconsistency by automatically detecting the presence of
overridden Filter#filterRow(). If filterRow() is implemented and not inherited from FilterBase,
it is equivalent to having hasFilterRow() return true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message