hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8763) [BRAINSTORM] Combine MVCC and SeqId
Date Tue, 27 May 2014 21:46:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14010336#comment-14010336
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8763:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12646094/hbase-8763-v4.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12646094

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 12 new or modified
tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9607//console

This message is automatically generated.

> [BRAINSTORM] Combine MVCC and SeqId
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8763
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HBase MVCC & LogSeqId Combined.pdf, hbase-8736-poc.patch, hbase-8763-poc-v1.patch,
hbase-8763-v1.patch, hbase-8763-v2.patch, hbase-8763-v3.patch, hbase-8763-v4.patch, hbase-8763_wip1.patch
>
>
> HBASE-8701 and a lot of recent issues include good discussions about mvcc + seqId semantics.
It seems that having mvcc and the seqId complicates the comparator semantics a lot in regards
to flush + WAL replay + compactions + delete markers and out of order puts. 
> Thinking more about it I don't think we need a MVCC write number which is different than
the seqId. We can keep the MVCC semantics, read point and smallest read points intact, but
combine mvcc write number and seqId. This will allow cleaner semantics + implementation +
smaller data files. 
> We can do some brainstorming for 0.98. We still have to verify that this would be semantically
correct, it should be so by my current understanding.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message