Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6611110F32 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 18:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46037 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2014 18:17:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45741 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2014 18:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 45557 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2014 18:17:47 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 18:17:47 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 18:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gary Helmling (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HBASE-10721) Parallelize execution of multi operations on RegionServer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Gary Helmling created HBASE-10721: ------------------------------------- Summary: Parallelize execution of multi operations on RegionServer Key: HBASE-10721 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10721 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Components: regionserver Reporter: Gary Helmling In the context of HBASE-10169, we're adding the ability to batch Coprocessor endpoint calls per regionserver, using the same batching that happens in the RegionServer.multi() calls. However, execution of each of the calls will still happen serially on each RegionServer. For Coprocessor endpoint calls, it might help to parallelize these, since each execution could be of indeterminate length. Since it may help to parallelize the Coprocessor endpoint invocations, it raises the question of whether other operations handled in multi() calls should also be parallelized, or should we just rely on macro-scale parallelization through the RPC handler threads? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)