hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10750) Pluggable MemStoreLAB
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:33:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13937496#comment-13937496

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-10750:

Can't we leave allocation as it is and use ByteRange inside allocations?  Instead of directly
returning a ByteRange. First thing is that naming is more relevant I thought and allocations
could call the apis on ByteRange.

> Pluggable MemStoreLAB
> ---------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-10750
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10750
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>         Attachments: HBASE-10750.patch, HBASE-10750_V2.patch
> This can allow one to have offheap MSLAB also. 
> The allocate() returns a byte[] now. This has to be changed to ByteRange so that the
impl can return on heap byte[] backed BR or offheap buffer backed BR.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message