hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10531) Revisit how the key byte[] is passed to HFileScanner.seekTo and reseekTo
Date Tue, 11 Mar 2014 05:50:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13929982#comment-13929982
] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-10531:
----------------------------------------

bq.Without copying bytes it seems to be better.
So as per this result, what is the % degrade over the current way (If any such degrade)

> Revisit how the key byte[] is passed to HFileScanner.seekTo and reseekTo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10531
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10531
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10531.patch, HBASE-10531_1.patch, HBASE-10531_2.patch
>
>
> Currently the byte[] key passed to HFileScanner.seekTo and HFileScanner.reseekTo, is
a combination of row, cf, qual, type and ts.  And the caller forms this by using kv.getBuffer,
which is actually deprecated.  So see how this can be achieved considering kv.getBuffer is
removed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message