Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08CBE1022C for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84949 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2014 13:02:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 84897 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2014 13:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 84826 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2014 13:02:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:12 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:02:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10431) Rename com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13885316#comment-13885316 ] Jonathan Hsieh commented on HBASE-10431: ---------------------------------------- I think we should do 0.96 also -- asynchbase would have problems with it as well. > Rename com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-10431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10431 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.96.1.1 > Reporter: Nicolas Liochon > Assignee: Nicolas Liochon > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.2, 0.99.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-10431.patch, HBASE-10431.v2.patch > > > As we are hijacking the protobuf package, we should do our best to limit the probability to have a conflict on the class name. > Today, we have the same class name as AsyncHBase, but our contains a method that AsyncHBase does not have. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)