Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F23211007C for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63216 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2014 21:23:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62971 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2014 21:23:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62644 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2014 21:23:27 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:23:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:23:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10339) Mutation::getFamilyMap method was lost in 96 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13871203#comment-13871203 ] Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-10339: ------------------------------------------ [~stack] [~apurtell] do you mind taking a look? backward compat with 94 issue > Mutation::getFamilyMap method was lost in 96 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-10339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10339 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0, 0.99.0 > Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin > Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.2, 0.99.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-10339.patch > > > When backward compat work was done in several jiras, this method was missed. First the return type was changed, then the method was rename to not break the callers via new return type, but the legacy method was never re-added as far as I see -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)