hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10431) Rename com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString
Date Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:44:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13885792#comment-13885792
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10431:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12625957/HBASE-10431.v3-0.98.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12625957

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 18 new or modified
tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8554//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Rename com.google.protobuf.ZeroCopyLiteralByteString
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10431
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.1.1
>            Reporter: Nicolas Liochon
>            Assignee: Nicolas Liochon
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.2, 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10431.patch, HBASE-10431.v2.patch, HBASE-10431.v3-0.96.patch,
HBASE-10431.v3-0.98.patch, HBASE-10431.v3.patch
>
>
> As we are hijacking the protobuf package, we should do our best to limit the probability
to have a conflict on the class name.
> Today, we have the same class name as AsyncHBase, but our contains a method that AsyncHBase
does not have.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message