hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9343) Implement stateless scanner for Stargate
Date Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:29:28 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13872383#comment-13872383
] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-9343:
---------------------------------------

bq. IMO, deprecation after major release – in point release – doesn't count. No harm adding
them though.

So then we only get one chance at each .0 to do deprecations? That is ... limiting. I tend
to look at each major release as one product. Any 0.94.x is 0.94, any 0.96.x is 0.96, and
such. My expectation is deploys are following along the minor version progression. Therefore
they will notice a deprecation. Every user is different, but we have a choice to generalize
in a way that is really restrictive on us or one that gives us more flexibility to get things
out in usable releases sooner.

> Implement stateless scanner for Stargate
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9343
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9343
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: REST
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.11
>            Reporter: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula
>            Assignee: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.98.1, 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-9343_94.00.patch, HBASE-9343_94.01.patch, HBASE-9343_trunk.00.patch,
HBASE-9343_trunk.01.patch, HBASE-9343_trunk.01.patch, HBASE-9343_trunk.02.patch, HBASE-9343_trunk.03.patch,
HBASE-9343_trunk.04.patch
>
>
> The current scanner implementation for scanner stores state and hence not very suitable
for REST server failure scenarios. The current JIRA proposes to implement a stateless scanner.
In the first version of the patch, a new resource class "ScanResource" has been added and
all the scan parameters will be specified as query params. 
> The following are the scan parameters
> startrow -  The start row for the scan.
> endrow - The end row for the scan.
> columns - The columns to scan. 
> starttime, endtime - To only retrieve columns within a specific range of version timestamps,both
start and end time must be specified.
> maxversions  - To limit the number of versions of each column to be returned.
> batchsize - To limit the maximum number of values returned for each call to next().
> limit - The number of rows to return in the scan operation.
>  More on start row, end row and limit parameters.
> 1. If start row, end row and limit not specified, then the whole table will be scanned.
> 2. If start row and limit (say N) is specified, then the scan operation will return N
rows from the start row specified.
> 3. If only limit parameter is specified, then the scan operation will return N rows from
the start of the table.
> 4. If limit and end row are specified, then the scan operation will return N rows from
start of table till the end row. If the end row is 
> reached before N rows ( say M and M &lt; N ), then M rows will be returned to the
user.
> 5. If start row, end row and limit (say N ) are specified and N &lt; number of rows
between start row and end row, then N rows from start row
> will be returned to the user. If N &gt; (number of rows between start row and end
row (say M), then M number of rows will be returned to the
> user.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message