hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10173) Need HFile version check in security coprocessors
Date Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:27:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13853340#comment-13853340
] 

Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-10173:
----------------------------------------

Still working on this. This has been good for catching the unit tests that fail to set hfile.format.version
to 3 where required. Almost ready.

> Need HFile version check in security coprocessors
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10173
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-10173.patch, HBASE-10173_partial.patch
>
>
> Cell level visibility labels are stored as cell tags. So HFile V3 is the minimum version
which can support this feature. Better to have a version check in VisibilityController. Some
one using this CP but with any HFile version as V2, we can better throw error.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Mime
View raw message