hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anoop Sam John (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10173) Need HFile version check in security coprocessors
Date Wed, 18 Dec 2013 03:32:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13851312#comment-13851312

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-10173:

bq.I can take this Anoop, let me know.
NP.. Pls go ahead Andy.

I am just attaching the patch I had initially which checks only in VisibilityController.

bq.We need this in the AC too after HBASE-7662
In 0.98 HFile V2 is the default version. If used want to use old way of AccessControl (Not
cell level) still he has to make the version to V3? I think the changes happened with AccessController
demands us to do so. We can document this change then, some where in 0.98 release contents.

> Need HFile version check in security coprocessors
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-10173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10173
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.99.0
> Cell level visibility labels are stored as cell tags. So HFile V3 is the minimum version
which can support this feature. Better to have a version check in VisibilityController. Some
one using this CP but with any HFile version as V2, we can better throw error.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message