hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10060) Unsynchronized scanning
Date Sun, 01 Dec 2013 05:08:36 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13835961#comment-13835961
] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10060:
---------------------------------------

Makes TestAtomicOperation fail, though. Will have a look later.

> Unsynchronized scanning
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10060
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10060
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>         Attachments: 10060-trunk.txt
>
>
> HBASE-10015 has some lengthy discussion. The solution there ended up replacing synchronized
with ReentrantLock, which - somewhat surprisingly - yielded a non-trivial improvement for
tall tables.
> The goal should be to avoid locking in StoreScanner at all. StoreScanner is only accessed
by a single thread *except* when we have a concurrent flush or a compaction, which is rare
(we'd acquire and release the lock millions of times per second, and compact/flush a few time
an hour at the most).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message