hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9426) Make custom distributed barrier procedure pluggable
Date Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:22:53 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13858592#comment-13858592

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-9426:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12620798

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.1 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version
1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to fail.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8301//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Make custom distributed barrier procedure pluggable 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-9426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9426
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.2, 0.94.11
>            Reporter: Richard Ding
>            Assignee: Richard Ding
>         Attachments: HBASE-9426-4.patch, HBASE-9426-4.patch, HBASE-9426.patch.1, HBASE-9426.patch.2,
> Currently if one wants to implement a custom distributed barrier procedure (e.g., distributed
log roll or distributed table flush), the HBase core code needs to be modified in order for
the procedure to work.
> Looking into the snapshot code (especially on region server side), most of the code to
enable the procedure are generic life-cycle management (i.e., init, start, stop). We can make
this part pluggable.
> Here is the proposal. Following the coprocessor example, we define two properties:
> {code}
> hbase.procedure.regionserver.classes
> hbase.procedure.master.classes
> {code}
> The values for both are comma delimited list of classes. On region server side, the classes
implements the following interface:
> {code}
> public interface RegionServerProcedureManager {
>   public void initialize(RegionServerServices rss) throws KeeperException;
>   public void start();
>   public void stop(boolean force) throws IOException;
>   public String getProcedureName();
> }
> {code}
> While on Master side, the classes implement the interface:
> {code}
> public interface MasterProcedureManager {
>   public void initialize(MasterServices master) throws KeeperException, IOException,
>   public void stop(String why);
>   public String getProcedureName();
>   public void execProcedure(ProcedureDescription desc) throws IOException;
>   IOException;
> }
> {code}
> Where the ProcedureDescription is defined as
> {code}
> message ProcedureDescription {
>   required string name = 1;
>   required string instance = 2;
>   optional int64 creationTime = 3 [default = 0];
>   message Property {
>     required string tag = 1;
>     optional string value = 2;
>   }
>   repeated Property props = 4;
> }
> {code}
> A generic API can be defined on HMaster to trigger a procedure:
> {code}
> public boolean execProcedure(ProcedureDescription desc) throws IOException;
> {code}
> _SnapshotManager_ and _RegionServerSnapshotManager_ are special examples of _MasterProcedureManager_
and _RegionServerProcedureManager_. They will be automatically included (users don't need
to specify them in the conf file).

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message