Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB7DF103E9 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14350 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 14312 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 14304 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 23:23:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9869) Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824669#comment-13824669 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-9869: ------------------------------- +1 > Optimize HConnectionManager#getCachedLocation > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-9869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9869 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Client > Affects Versions: 0.98.0, 0.96.0 > Reporter: Nicolas Liochon > Assignee: Nicolas Liochon > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1 > > Attachments: 6869.v4.patch, 9869.v1.patch, 9869.v1.patch, 9869.v2.patch > > > It javadoc says: "TODO: This method during writing consumes 15% of CPU doing lookup". This is still true, says Yourkit. With 0.96, we also spend more time in these methods. We retry more, and the AsyncProcess calls it in parallel. > I don't have the patch for this yet, but I will spend some time on it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)