Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88FC91064D for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79090 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2013 13:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 78964 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2013 13:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 78925 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2013 13:55:23 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:55:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:55:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kashif J S (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9850) Issues with UI for table compact/split operation completion. After split/compaction operation using UI, the page is not automatically redirecting back using IE8/Firefox. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13814899#comment-13814899 ] Kashif J S commented on HBASE-9850: ----------------------------------- Hi Hadoop QA, >>-1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. >>Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. >>Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. This was UI issue. manually pressing the compact/split/clone/restore buttons would take you to "Request Action accepted" page. No Junit TC is required I guess. Do you write automation TC for UI ? >>-1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. Since this patch involves modification of JSP pages (table.jsp and snapshot.jsp), I think this javadoc warning is not related to this patch. please confirm >>-1 site. The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to fail. I think this is not related to this patch. please confirm >>-1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests: >>org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestLogRolling I think this is not related to this patch since this patch involves modification of JSP pages (table.jsp and snapshot.jsp). please confirm > Issues with UI for table compact/split operation completion. After split/compaction operation using UI, the page is not automatically redirecting back using IE8/Firefox. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-9850 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9850 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: UI > Affects Versions: 0.94.11 > Reporter: Kashif J S > Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1, 0.94.14 > > Attachments: HBASE-9850.patch > > > Steps: > 1. create table with regions. > 2. insert some amount of data in such a way that make some Hfiles which is lessthan min.compacted files size (say 3 hfiles are there but min compaction files 10) > 3. from ui perform compact operation on the table. > "TABLE ACTION REQUEST Accepted" page is displayed > 4. operation is failing becoz compaction criteria is not meeting. but from ui compaction requests are continously sending to server. This happens using IE(history.back() seems to resend compact/split request). Firefox seems Ok in this case. > 5. Later no automatic redirection to main hamster page occurs. > SOLUTION: > table.jsp in hbase master. > The meta tag for HTML contains refresh with javascript:history.back(). > A javascript cannot execute in the meta refresh tag like above in table.jsp and snapshot.jsp > > This will FAIL. > W3 school also suggests to use refresh in JAVAscript rather than meta tag. > If above meta is replaced as below, the behavior is OK verified for IE8/Firefox. > > Hence in table.jsp and snapshot.jsp, it should be modified as above. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)