hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nick Dimiduk (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9940) PerformanceEvaluation should have a test with many table options on (Bloom, compression, FAST_DIFF, etc.)
Date Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:45:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819288#comment-13819288
] 

Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-9940:
-------------------------------------

I hadn't checked vs 0.94. Yes, these are useful features that should be back-ported. +1 for
that.

Can't blockSize be effectively set via -D option?

I'd also like to add a --sampleSize option, at least RandomRead, because it runs a looong
time if you're running it against a table of any size. I have this feature in my own branch,
which I've been using locally. I have it dumping the times taken by individual test threads
so that they can be re-assembled for request latency analysis.

> PerformanceEvaluation should have a test with many table options on (Bloom, compression,
FAST_DIFF, etc.)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-9940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9940
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.0, 0.94.13
>            Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>            Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message