hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Enis Soztutar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9909) TestHFilePerformance should not be a unit test, but a tool
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 02:39:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815577#comment-13815577

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-9909:

bq. I would love to see a "proxy" for all those performance testing files... Can we also modify
PE to have an option to test the HFilePerf the same way we have randowWrite, etc.?
Sure, not in this issue though. 
bq. TestHFilePerformance and HFilePerformanceEvaluation ?
Looked at those, it seems these are slightly different. TestHFilePerformance is more focussed
on perf for seq writes and reads between hfile and seq file. 

> TestHFilePerformance should not be a unit test, but a tool
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-9909
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9909
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.96.1
>         Attachments: hbase-9909_v1.patch
> TestHFilePerformance is a very old test, which does not test anything, but a perf evaluation
tool. It is not clear to me whether there is any utility for keeping it, but that should at
least be converted to be a tool. 
> Note that TestHFile already covers the unit test cases (writing hfile with none and gz
compression). We do not need to test SequenceFile. 

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message